Kalshi Lawsuits: Litigation Tracker

October 2026

• RulingOctober 30, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Raoul

  Judge Pacold entered the preliminary injunction in Kalshi’s Illinois case, covering the State’s new prediction-market taxes and fees, and Illinois appealed to the Seventh Circuit the same day.

  Preliminary injunction, N.D. Ill. No. 1:26-cv-07363 (ECF 64)

• ScheduleOctober 30, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (cert. sought sub nom. Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC)

  The Supreme Court extended Kalshi’s time to answer New Jersey’s cert petition (No. 26-299) a second time, to December 7, 2026; New Jersey did not oppose. Paul Clement signed the request as Kalshi’s counsel.

  Supreme Court docket, No. 26-299

• FilingOctober 30, 2026

  People of the State of New York v. KalshiEX LLC

  Kalshi asked Judge Broderick for a protective order against an Attorney General investigative subpoena it says seeks discovery on the pending case. The Attorney General says the subpoena belongs to a separate investigation into possible fraud and false advertising in the prediction-market industry. The remand motion is still undecided.

  Joint letter, S.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-06550 (ECF 23)

• FilingOctober 30, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Martin

  Maryland told the Fourth Circuit that the CFTC’s October swap-definition rules do not support reversal, calling them inconsistent with the statute and beyond the agency’s authority. The appeal, argued in May, is still undecided.

  Maryland’s Rule 28(j) response, 4th Cir. No. 25-1892 (Doc. 134)

• ScheduleOctober 28, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (6th Cir., consolidated with the Tennessee appeal)

  The Sixth Circuit ordered Ohio and Tennessee to respond to Kalshi’s petition for rehearing en banc by November 12, with no extensions. The mandate still has not issued, so the Tennessee injunction remains in place.

  Letter directing responses, 6th Cir. Nos. 26-3196/5235 (Dkt. 95)

• New caseOctober 28, 2026

  State of Utah v. KalshiEX, LLC

  Utah’s Attorney General’s Office charged KalshiEX with 14 counts, including a felony pattern of unlawful activity, over twelve sports trades an undercover agent placed from Utah, and named co-founders Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara as co-defendants. Kalshi’s initial appearance is set for December 4.

  Co-Defendant Information, State of Utah v. KalshiEX, LLC (Oct. 28, 2026)

• FilingOctober 28, 2026

  United States v. State of Wisconsin

  Wisconsin filed its consolidated response brief in the Seventh Circuit, and the United States and the CFTC answered Kalshi’s and the American Gaming Association’s appeals the same day. Replies are due November 19.

  Seventh Circuit docket, No. 26-2636 (Dkt. 41, 47, 48)

• FilingOctober 28, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Cox

  Ohio, Nevada, 35 other states, the District of Columbia and the Northern Mariana Islands filed an amicus brief in the Tenth Circuit supporting Utah against Kalshi’s appeal, joined by briefs from tribal groups, the American Gaming Association and others.

  Brief of Amici Curiae Ohio, Nevada et al., 10th Cir. No. 26-4100

• New caseOctober 27, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Hanaway

  Kalshi sued Missouri’s Attorney General and Gaming Commission in the Eastern District of Missouri after the State’s Solicitor General said Missouri would not hold off enforcement past Kalshi’s extended October 30 deadline. Kalshi is the third cease-and-desist recipient to sue.

  Complaint, E.D. Mo. No. 4:26-cv-01860 (Doc. 1)

• RulingOctober 27, 2026

  Ho-Chunk Nation v. Kalshi, Inc.

  The Seventh Circuit granted Kalshi permission to appeal Judge Conley’s ruling that the Ho-Chunk Nation’s IGRA claim can proceed, and denied the Nation’s cross-petition to add the rulings that went against it. The district case stays on hold.

  Seventh Circuit order, No. 26-8020 (Oct. 27, 2026)

• New caseOctober 23, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Murrill

  Kalshi sued Louisiana’s Attorney General, Governor and Gaming Control Board in federal court to block enforcement it says is imminent. It is the first case on this tracker in the Fifth Circuit.

  Complaint, KalshiEX LLC v. Murrill, W.D. La. No. 1:26-cv-04476

• RulingOctober 21, 2026

  Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc.

  Judge Corley let the California tribes amend their complaint to add a third tribe, the Buena Vista Rancheria, terminated the pending motions to dismiss without prejudice, and directed the parties to negotiate a stipulation on geofencing tribal lands. The amended complaint and a further conference are set for November 4; no injunction is in place.

  Order, N.D. Cal. No. 3:25-cv-06162 (ECF 103)

• ScheduleOctober 21, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Williams

  The Second Circuit set argument for November 3 on Kalshi’s motion for an injunction pending appeal in its New York case, heard with the Connecticut motions. The CFTC has asked for argument time; New York opposes.

  Notice, 2d Cir. No. 26-1835 (ECF 60)

• ScheduleOctober 21, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Cafferelli

  The Second Circuit set argument for November 3 on Kalshi’s motion for an injunction pending appeal in its Connecticut case, in tandem with the New York and Coinbase motions. Connecticut’s merits brief is due November 20.

  Kalshi’s letter, captioned in 2d Cir. Nos. 26-1835 and 26-2239 (ECF 68)

• New caseOctober 20, 2026

  Brown v. Kalshi Inc. (Utah Attorney General)

  Utah’s Attorney General sued Kalshi and the trading firm Susquehanna in Salt Lake County state court. The suit calls Kalshi’s sports, election and other contracts illegal gambling and a public nuisance, and seeks an injunction plus restitution and disgorgement.

  Verified complaint, Brown v. Kalshi Inc. (Utah 3d Dist. Ct.)

• ScheduleOctober 19, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Ellison; QCX LLC (Polymarket US) v. Ellison

  No schedule was set at Minnesota’s October 15 conference. The magistrate judge ordered the State to explain by October 29 what facts it needs discovery on, such as whether an event contract is a swap, with objections due November 12, before he decides whether discovery happens at all.

  Order, D. Minn. No. 0:26-cv-02661 (ECF 93)

• FilingOctober 16, 2026

  Missouri Attorney General cease-and-desist letters (September 2026)

  Missouri’s thirty-day deadlines passed without a suit by the State. Novig and Crypto.com’s exchange sued in federal court instead; Kalshi, Polymarket, Robinhood and Underdog had not, as of the latest docket checks.

  Complaint, Ludlow Exchange, LLC d/b/a Novig v. Hanaway, E.D. Mo. No. 4:26-cv-01780

• CorrectionOctober 14, 2026

  Kentucky enforcement actions v. Kalshi & others (Franklin Circuit Court)

  Our entry said Kentucky’s remand motion in the Kalshi action was still with the district judge. A magistrate judge recommended on October 14 that the Kalshi case go back to state court, as he did the same day in the Polymarket case; objections in the Kalshi action are now due November 12.

  E.D. Ky. No. 3:26-cv-00048, R. 67 (docket text)

• RulingOctober 14, 2026

  Kentucky enforcement actions v. Kalshi & others (Franklin Circuit Court)

  A federal magistrate judge recommended that Kentucky’s suit against Polymarket be sent back to state court. It is a recommendation, not a ruling; the district judge has not yet acted on it. Kentucky’s remand motion in the Kalshi action is still undecided.

  Report and Recommendation, E.D. Ky. No. 3:26-cv-00047 (ECF 41)

• CorrectionOctober 13, 2026

  United States v. State of Wisconsin

  Our entry said Wisconsin’s brief was due October 21 and replies November 12. An October 13 order had moved those dates to October 28 and November 19.

  Seventh Circuit order, No. 26-2636 (Dkt. 41, Oct. 13, 2026)

• FilingOctober 12, 2026

  KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad (below: KalshiEX LLC v. Hendrick)

  Kalshi told the Ninth Circuit that the CFTC’s new swap-definition rules support rehearing in Assad, and asked again that the court wait for final rules. The court accepted three amicus briefs on October 13, and the petition remains pending.

  Kalshi’s Rule 28(j) letter, 9th Cir. No. 25-7516 (Dkt. 226)

• FilingOctober 9, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (6th Cir., consolidated with the Tennessee appeal)

  Kalshi asked the full Sixth Circuit to rehear its Ohio and Tennessee loss, and the CFTC filed an amicus brief in the rehearing proceedings on October 16. The mandate has not issued, so the Tennessee injunction remains in place for now.

  Petition for rehearing en banc, 6th Cir. Nos. 26-3196/5235

• FilingOctober 8, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Raoul

  All parties reported that no separate briefing on Kalshi’s fee challenge is needed: Illinois’s 1.75% and 3.5% transaction taxes apply only to licensees, so the coming injunction against the licensing requirement also keeps them off Kalshi.

  Joint status report, N.D. Ill. No. 1:26-cv-03659 (ECF 101)

• FilingOctober 8, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (cert. sought sub nom. Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC)

  Amicus briefs supporting New Jersey’s petition arrived through October 8: Ohio with 38 other states and D.C., the NFL, the American Gaming Association, 145 tribes and tribal organizations, former CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler and former Senator Christopher Dodd, after earlier briefs from gaming legislators and regulators. Kalshi’s response is due November 9.

  Supreme Court docket, No. 26-299

• RulingOctober 8, 2026

  Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc.

  The Ninth Circuit’s mandate issued, returning the tribes’ case to Judge Corley, who set a status conference for October 21 to discuss next steps. No injunction is in place yet.

  Docket, 3:25-cv-06162 (N.D. Cal.), ECF 99–100

• RulingOctober 2, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Raoul

  Judge Pacold granted the injunction motion in part in a single opinion covering all three Illinois cases: Illinois’s licensing rules are likely preempted as applied to title contracts, and the fee challenge is continued. A proposed injunction is due October 29.

  Memorandum opinion and order, N.D. Ill. (October 2, 2026)

• FilingOctober 1, 2026

  KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad (below: KalshiEX LLC v. Hendrick)

  Kalshi asked the Ninth Circuit to hold its Assad rehearing petition until the CFTC finalizes its revised Rule 40.11, which the agency expects within two months; Nevada opposed on October 1. The petition is still pending, which keeps the mandate from issuing.

  Nevada's response letter, 9th Cir. No. 25-7516

• RulingOctober 1, 2026

  Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Kalshi

  Judge Abelson stayed Baltimore’s case by agreement, including the City’s September 14 remand motion, for four months or until the Supreme Court disposes of the last of the three pending preemption petitions. We had the judge as Bredar; it is Abelson.

  Stipulation, 1:26-cv-03217 (D. Md.), ECF 33

• FilingOctober 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Martin

  The Fourth Circuit still has not decided Kalshi’s Maryland appeal, argued in May. In October Kalshi pointed the panel to the CFTC’s new swap-definition rules, and Maryland answered with the Sixth Circuit’s Schuler decision.

  Maryland’s Rule 28(j) response, 4th Cir. No. 25-1892 (Doc. 133, Oct. 26, 2026)

• New caseOctober 2026

  Matter of New York State Gaming Commission v. Kalshi, Inc. (subpoena enforcement)

  New York’s Gaming Commission petitioned the state court in Manhattan to compel Kalshi to comply with the investigative subpoenas it served in July. It is a separate proceeding from the Attorney General’s enforcement petition.

  New York’s Rule 28(j) letter, 2d Cir. No. 26-1835 (ECF 62)

September 2026

• CorrectionSeptember 30, 2026

  Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc.

  The tribes’ suit names both Kalshi, Inc. and KalshiEX LLC as defendants, as the court’s caption shows; we had listed only Kalshi, Inc.

  Notice of supplemental authority, D.N.M. No. 2:26-cv-01517 (Doc. 60)

• FilingSeptember 28, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Cox

  The CFTC filed an amicus brief in Kalshi’s Tenth Circuit appeal against Utah, and the court accepted one from Paradigm Operations. Utah’s answering brief was due October 21; its filing is not yet confirmed on the public record.

  Tenth Circuit docket, No. 26-4100

• ScheduleSeptember 25, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Ellison; QCX LLC (Polymarket US) v. Ellison

  Minnesota did not appeal the July 27 injunction against its prediction-market ban: the lead docket shows no notice of appeal after the sixty-day window closed September 25. The case moves to merits scheduling, with a conference reset to October 15.

  D. Minn. No. 0:26-cv-02661 docket

• RulingSeptember 25, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Schuler (6th Cir., consolidated with the Tennessee appeal)

  The Sixth Circuit ruled for Ohio and Tennessee in a published opinion: Kalshi has not shown its sports contracts are swaps, and even if they were, the CEA would not preempt either state’s gambling law. It affirmed Ohio’s denial and vacated Tennessee’s injunction. The circuits now stand two to one against the platforms.

  Sixth Circuit opinion, Nos. 26-3196/5235

• FilingSeptember 24, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

  The CFTC told the Ninth Circuit it expects its revised Rule 40.11 — the rule governing which event contracts exchanges may list — to be final within two months. Kalshi relayed the statement to the Fourth Circuit the next day and asked it to wait for the rule.

  CFTC response, 9th Cir. No. 26-4281 (Dkt. 29)

• CorrectionSeptember 23, 2026

  State of Washington v. KalshiEX LLC

  We had described the Ninth Circuit’s role in Washington’s case as stay rulings only. Kalshi’s appeal of the remand order (No. 26-3106) is a live appeal; on September 23 the court paused it until 30 days after the Nevada appeals’ mandates issue.

  Order, 9th Cir. No. 26-3106 (Dkt. 31)

• CorrectionSeptember 23, 2026

  Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc.

  We had the tribes’ docket number as 1:26-cv-01517. The court’s own header reads 2:26-cv-01517 (Las Cruces division).

  Clerk's minutes, 2:26-cv-01517 (D.N.M.), ECF 59

• HearingSeptember 23, 2026

  Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc.

  Judge Strickland heard the New Mexico tribes’ motion to make Kalshi geofence tribal lands, together with Kalshi’s motion to dismiss. No ruling from the bench.

  CourtListener — clerk’s minutes (Doc. 59)

• ScheduleSeptember 22, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty (cert. sought sub nom. Flaherty v. KalshiEX, LLC)

  New Jersey’s petition, docketed September 8 as No. 26-299, will not reach conference before November: the Court extended Kalshi’s response to November 9, 2026. The first amicus brief, from the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States, was submitted the same day.

  Supreme Court docket No. 26-299

• CorrectionSeptember 21, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Bird

  We had said the hearing transcript was due October 27. It was filed in the district court on September 21. Kalshi’s Eighth Circuit opening brief is still due November 6.

  Docket, S.D. Iowa No. 4:26-cv-00109 (Dkt. 63–64)

• FilingSeptember 21, 2026

  United States v. State of Wisconsin

  All three appellants filed their Seventh Circuit opening briefs on time — the United States and the CFTC, Kalshi, and the American Gaming Association — and Paradigm Operations filed an amicus brief. Wisconsin’s brief is due October 21.

  Seventh Circuit docket No. 26-2636

• RulingSeptember 21, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Knudsen

  Kalshi’s Montana case is over: dismissed on a joint stipulation in exchange for Montana’s promise not to enforce until the Ninth Circuit resolves Kalshi’s en banc petition in Assad, then only on thirty days’ notice. We had also missed Judge Molloy’s August 27 denial of the injunction.

  Joint stipulation of dismissal (Doc. 35)

• CorrectionSeptember 17, 2026

  Missouri Attorney General cease-and-desist letters (September 2026)

  We said Missouri’s letter stated no deadline. All six letters give thirty days from their date, so the windows close October 16 for Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com and Robinhood and October 17 for Novig and Underdog, after which the State says it will sue.

  Missouri AG — letter to Kalshi

• FilingSeptember 17, 2026

  State of Connecticut v. KalshiEX LLC

  Connecticut moved on September 8 to send its case against Kalshi back to state court, and Judge Oliver froze every other deadline until he decides that. Kalshi’s response is due September 29.

  CourtListener — 3:26-cv-01382

• FilingSeptember 17, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Bird

  Kalshi’s Iowa appeal was docketed in the Eighth Circuit as No. 26-2874 — the first time that circuit has the preemption question. Kalshi’s opening brief is due November 6, 2026.

  Eighth Circuit briefing schedule (Doc. 62)

• RulingSeptember 16, 2026

  Blue Lake Rancheria v. Kalshi, Inc.

  The Ninth Circuit reversed in part for the California tribes in a published opinion: Kalshi’s sports contracts are class III gaming when entered from tribal land, and the Commodity Exchange Act does not displace the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. It remanded for the remaining injunction factors; no injunction is in place yet.

  Ninth Circuit opinion, No. 25-7504

• New caseSeptember 16, 2026

  Missouri Attorney General cease-and-desist letters (September 2026)

  Missouri’s Attorney General told Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Novig, Underdog and Robinhood to stop offering sports event contracts or be licensed and taxed as sportsbooks. No suit has been filed by either side.

  Missouri AG — letter to Kalshi

• RulingSeptember 11, 2026

  Ho-Chunk Nation v. Kalshi, Inc.

  Judge Conley certified his IGRA ruling for interlocutory appeal, denied the Nation leave to amend, and stayed the case, taking the May 2027 trial off the calendar. Kalshi petitioned the Seventh Circuit on September 21 (No. 26-8020).

  Opinion and order (Doc. 114)

• FilingSeptember 9, 2026

  KalshiEX, LLC v. Assad (below: KalshiEX LLC v. Hendrick)

  Kalshi asked the Ninth Circuit to rehear Assad, by the panel or en banc. The petition holds the mandate, so the remand on election contracts and the stayed Arizona appeal both wait on it. Paradigm Operations and the Coalition for Prediction Markets filed amicus briefs in support.

  CourtListener — No. 25-7516 (9th Cir.)

• CorrectionSeptember 8, 2026

  State of Rhode Island v. KalshiEX LLC

  Rhode Island’s case is formally consolidated with Kalshi’s own suit before Chief Judge McElroy, and Polymarket US is a co-defendant in it. We had described three parallel tracks and a separate CFTC suit; the CFTC intervened rather than suing.

  Kalshi filing under the consolidated caption

• RulingSeptember 8, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Bird

  Judge Locher denied Kalshi’s injunction against Iowa: express preemption is unlikely because “swap” does not clearly reach sports outcomes, and Kalshi showed no irreparable harm.

  Order denying preliminary injunction (Doc. 57)

• RulingSeptember 8, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Cox

  The Tenth Circuit refused Kalshi an injunction pending its appeal of the Utah judgment, so nothing bars Utah from enforcing while the appeal runs. Some outlets date the order September 9 or 10; it is file-stamped September 8.

  Tenth Circuit order (Doc. 19)

• RulingSeptember 1, 2026

  Nessel v. KalshiEX LLC

  Judge Aquilina replaced Michigan’s TRO with a preliminary injunction that runs to final judgment: sports contracts barred, a $500,000-a-day penalty for failing licensed geolocation, and notice to every broker that offers Kalshi’s sports contracts.

  Order Granting Preliminary Injunction (Ingham County)

• RulingSeptember 2026

  State of Washington v. KalshiEX LLC

  Judge McHale denied Kalshi’s motion to reconsider Washington’s amended injunction, which had leaned on the state’s August 18 non-enforcement deal with Crypto.com’s exchange. Reports date the order September 16 or 18.

  Law360

• ScheduleSeptember 2026

  Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc.

  The New Mexico tribes’ injunction motion, which would make Kalshi geofence tribal lands, and Kalshi’s motion to dismiss are fully briefed. A hearing is reported set for September 23 in Las Cruces.

  Source NM

August 2026

• CorrectionAugust 31, 2026

  Kentucky enforcement actions v. Kalshi & others (Franklin Circuit Court)

  Kentucky’s June filings were two complaints, not one: the Kalshi action (No. 26-CI-00689, Judge Shepherd) names Kalshi with its brokers Robinhood, Webull and Coinbase, and Polymarket is sued separately. Kalshi removed its case to federal court; Kentucky’s remand motion was fully briefed August 31.

  Kentucky AG — Kalshi complaint (No. 26-CI-00689)

• CorrectionAugust 12, 2026

  State of Washington v. KalshiEX LLC

  We dated Washington’s amended preliminary injunction August 13. The order was signed and filed August 12, 2026.

  King County Superior Court — Amended and Updated Order (No. 26-2-10264-3 SEA)

• CorrectionAugust 10, 2026

  People of the State of New York v. KalshiEX LLC

  We said this case had been referred to Judge Torres. She declined it as unrelated on August 10 and it went to Judge Broderick. We had also omitted New York’s remand motion, fully briefed since August 28 and undecided.

  CourtListener — 1:26-cv-06550

• CorrectionAugust 7, 2026

  State of Wisconsin v. Kalshi, Inc.

  Our entry had not been updated since April. Wisconsin’s own preliminary-injunction motion against Kalshi and its brokers has been fully briefed since August 7, alongside a pending motion to remand; neither has been decided.

  CourtListener — 3:26-cv-00378

• FilingAugust 2026

  State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. KalshiEX LLC

  The Control Board told the Carson City court Kalshi missed its August 12 geofencing deadline and asked for the stipulated $120,000-a-day penalty. Kalshi disputes it. We had carried the deadline as upcoming; no ruling has been reported.

  The Nevada Independent

July 2026

• CorrectionJuly 8, 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Williams

  Our pages disagreed on when Kalshi appealed Judge Torres’s ruling, saying both “the same day” and “the next day.” The Second Circuit docketed the appeal on July 8, 2026; we now say only that.

  CourtListener — KalshiEX LLC v. Williams, No. 26-1835 (2d Cir.)

• CorrectionJuly 2026

  State of New Mexico v. Kalshi, Inc.

  Our entry missed that New Mexico moved in July to send its suit against Kalshi back to state court. The motion has been fully briefed since August and is undecided; a November 10 status conference will set a motions hearing.

  Memorandum in support of remand, D.N.M. No. 6:26-cv-01857 (ECF 31)

• CorrectionJuly 2026

  State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. KalshiEX LLC

  We added two appeals our entry missed: Kalshi’s appeal of the state injunction to the Nevada Supreme Court (No. 92771), where a stay was denied, and its live Ninth Circuit appeal of the remand order (No. 26-1304), which we had described as stay rulings only. The Carson City judge is Jason Woodbury.

  Nevada Supreme Court, No. 92771: order denying a stay

June 2026

• New caseJune 12, 2026

  Coalition for Fair Markets v. Coleman

  Added to the tracker: the platforms’ own challenge to Kentucky’s 14.25% prediction-market tax and licensee contracting ban, filed by the Coalition for Fair Markets (Kalshi, Crypto.com’s exchange and Polymarket US) in Franklin Circuit Court as No. 26-CI-00667. Its claims now run through the federal case against Kentucky.

  Complaint, Franklin Circuit No. 26-CI-00667 (E.D. Ky. ECF 18-2)

• CorrectionJune 2026

  State of New Mexico v. Kalshi, Inc.

  Our entry listed only Kalshi, Inc. as a defendant in New Mexico’s suit. The docket shows KalshiEX LLC is a defendant too.

  D.N.M. No. 6:26-cv-01857 (docket)

• CorrectionJune 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Ohio Casino Control Commission (fine challenge)

  We said the CFTC and 39 states plus D.C. filed on opposite sides of Kalshi’s Ohio fine challenge. They did not: the CFTC’s brief was in the federal Sixth Circuit appeal, and the multistate brief was in Massachusetts. Removed.

  The Block — CFTC backs Kalshi in the Sixth Circuit

May 2026

• CorrectionMay 2026

  KalshiEX LLC v. Johnson

  Our entry credited Kalshi with the Arizona injunction. It was won by the United States and the CFTC on their own motion; Kalshi’s motion was denied in April and is on appeal as No. 26-2978. Corrected from Arizona’s Ninth Circuit status report.

  Arizona status report, No. 26-4281 (9th Cir.)

February 2026

• CorrectionFebruary 17, 2026

  State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. KalshiEX LLC

  We had the parties reversed. This is the Nevada Gaming Control Board’s enforcement action against Kalshi, filed in Carson City in February 2026 (No. 260000050-1B), not a suit by Kalshi. Kalshi’s own suit against the Board is the federal Assad case.

  Notice of Removal, D. Nev. No. 2:26-cv-00406

December 2025

• CorrectionDecember 5, 2025

  KalshiEX LLC v. Murrill

  Our Louisiana page said no state agency had taken prediction-market enforcement action. That was incomplete: the Gaming Control Board’s December 5, 2025 advisory notice declared sports event contracts illegal gambling, as Kalshi’s new complaint quotes it.

  Complaint, KalshiEX LLC v. Murrill, W.D. La. No. 1:26-cv-04476, ¶ 71

September 2024

• CorrectionSeptember 12, 2024

  KalshiEX LLC v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

  Two of our docket links pointed to unrelated cases: the District of Columbia link went to a bankruptcy case and the D.C. Circuit link to a South Carolina family-court matter. They now point to Nos. 1:23-cv-03257 and 24-5205. The stay-opinion link was also replaced with the D.C. Circuit’s October 2, 2024 opinion.

  CourtListener — D.D.C. No. 1:23-cv-03257