Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc.

Pending10th Cir.Tribe v. Platform

Docket last checked September 26, 2026. Snapshot — not legal advice.

As of September 27, 2026, the legality of prediction markets in New Mexico is unresolved — litigation is ongoing with no final ruling yet. New Mexico status and cases →

Overview

Four New Mexico tribal plaintiffs, led by the Mescalero Apache Tribe (with the Pueblos of Sandia, Isleta, and Pojoaque), sued Kalshi under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (filed May 12, 2026), alleging its sports contracts amount to illegal sports betting on or affecting tribal lands. Kalshi moved to dismiss in June; the tribes moved for a preliminary injunction that would require Kalshi to geofence tribal lands, and both motions are now fully briefed. A hearing on them was reported set for September 23, 2026 in Las Cruces. The Ninth Circuit’s Blue Lake Rancheria decision is persuasive authority here, not binding: New Mexico sits in the Tenth Circuit. (Caption + docket confirmed via CourtListener: Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Kalshi, Inc., D.N.M. No. 1:26-cv-01517, before Judge Strickland.)

Changes

Logged September 26, 2026

  • Hearing

    Judge Strickland heard the New Mexico tribes’ motion to make Kalshi geofence tribal lands, together with Kalshi’s motion to dismiss. No ruling from the bench.

    CourtListener — clerk’s minutes (Doc. 59)

Logged September 22, 2026

  • Schedule

    The New Mexico tribes’ injunction motion, which would make Kalshi geofence tribal lands, and Kalshi’s motion to dismiss are fully briefed. A hearing is reported set for September 23 in Las Cruces.

    Source NM

Timeline

May 2026

New Mexico tribes sue Kalshi under IGRA.

June 2026

Kalshi moves to dismiss.

September 2026

The tribes file their final brief for a preliminary injunction requiring geofencing of tribal lands.

September 22, 2026

The Blue Lake and Chicken Ranch Rancherias and the Ho-Chunk Nation are granted leave to file an amicus brief.

September 23, 2026

Hearing held on both motions; rulings pending.

What's next: Judge Strickland heard the tribes’ injunction motion and Kalshi’s motion to dismiss on September 23, 2026 in Las Cruces; both are under advisement. One of six New Mexico actions.

Parties

Plaintiffs

  • Mescalero Apache Tribe
  • Pueblo of Sandia
  • Pueblo of Isleta
  • Pueblo of Pojoaque

Defendants

  • Kalshi, Inc.
This page is informational, not legal advice. Nearly every entry in this tracker is a preliminary ruling under appeal. Always verify a platform's current, location-specific eligibility directly with the venue before relying on this page.