Injunction denied; on appeal (4th Cir.)4th Cir.Kalshi v. State
Last updated August 16, 2026. Snapshot — not legal advice.
Overview
Judge Adam Abelson (D. Md.) denied Kalshi’s request for a preliminary injunction, holding that while the Commodity Exchange Act overrides state commodity regulation, it does not preempt state authority over betting; because Kalshi did not show a likelihood of success, the court did not reach the other injunction factors. The Fourth Circuit heard argument in May 2026 and was reportedly skeptical of Kalshi’s theory. The decision is pending, and the state agreed not to enforce until the court rules. (The earlier working name "Martinez" for this case was incorrect — the defendant is Director John Martin.)
Timeline
August 2025
District court (Judge Abelson) denies Kalshi a preliminary injunction; Kalshi appeals to the Fourth Circuit (No. 25-1892).
What's next: Fourth Circuit decision pending; state agreed not to enforce until the court rules.
Parties
Plaintiffs
KalshiEX LLC
Defendants
John Martin (Director, Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency)
This page is informational, not legal advice. Nearly every entry in this tracker is a preliminary ruling under appeal. Always verify a platform's current, location-specific eligibility directly with the venue before relying on this page.
See what's actually trading
Browse live prediction-market volume and activity across every tracked platform.