State of Connecticut v. KalshiEX LLC

Removed; remand motion pending2d Cir.State v. Platform

Docket last checked September 22, 2026. Snapshot — not legal advice.

As of September 25, 2026, the legality of prediction markets in Connecticut is unresolved — litigation is ongoing with no final ruling yet. Connecticut status and cases →

Overview

Connecticut’s own enforcement action against Kalshi. The state filed it in Hartford Superior Court (No. HHD-CV26-6230345-S) with a September 15, 2026 return date, and Kalshi removed it to the District of Connecticut on August 26, 2026. It is the sequel to the state’s December 2025 cease-and-desist, which went to three platforms — Kalshi, Robinhood and Crypto.com — not to Kalshi alone.

Connecticut is now the most crowded single-state docket on this tracker: the state is suing Kalshi here; Kalshi is separately suing the state’s consumer-protection regulators and lost its injunction in August; and the United States and the CFTC are suing Connecticut to block enforcement outright. No ruling has issued in this action.

Changes

Logged September 22, 2026

  • Filing

    Connecticut moved on September 8 to send its case against Kalshi back to state court, and Judge Oliver froze every other deadline until he decides that. Kalshi’s response is due September 29.

    CourtListener — 3:26-cv-01382

Timeline

August 2026

Connecticut sues KalshiEX LLC in Hartford Superior Court (No. HHD-CV26-6230345-S), moving for a temporary injunction.

August 26, 2026

Kalshi removes the action to the District of Connecticut (No. 3:26-cv-01382).

August 31, 2026

Case reassigned to Judge Vernon D. Oliver, who is already hearing Kalshi’s and Coinbase’s suits against the state.

September 8, 2026

Connecticut moves to remand to state court.

September 17, 2026

Judge Oliver stays all other deadlines until he decides remand.

What's next: Connecticut moved on September 8, 2026 to send the case back to Hartford Superior Court. On September 17 Judge Vernon D. Oliver — who also has Kalshi’s and Coinbase’s suits against the state — stayed every other deadline until he decides remand; if the case stays federal, Kalshi answers within thirty days of that ruling. September 29, 2026: Kalshi’s response to the remand motion due

Parties

Plaintiffs

  • State of Connecticut

Defendants

  • KalshiEX LLC
This page is informational, not legal advice. Nearly every entry in this tracker is a preliminary ruling under appeal. Always verify a platform's current, location-specific eligibility directly with the venue before relying on this page.