Polymarket Lawsuits: Litigation Tracker
Last updated September 25, 2026. Snapshot, not legal advice.
Cases
12
Pending
9
Pro-market
0
Anti-market
2
Enjoined
1
Summary
Polymarket is a party to 12 cases of the 74 on this tracker, involving 11 states.
Restricted (2)
-
QCX, LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. Nessel
No. 1:26-cv-00710 · No. 26-1552
Judge Maloney denied Polymarket US a preliminary injunction (June 2026), holding sports event contracts are not swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act.Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. Blockratize Inc. (Polymarket)
No. 26OC000121B · No. 3:26-cv-00089 · No. 26-1343
Remanded to state court (March 2026) over Polymarket’s objection; the state court has since entered a preliminary injunction, and the Ninth Circuit refused to stay the remand.Checked Sep 25, 2026
Blocked for Market (1)
-
KalshiEX LLC v. Ellison; QCX LLC (Polymarket US) v. Ellison
No. 0:26-cv-02778 · No. 0:26-cv-02841
One July 27, 2026 opinion preliminarily enjoined the first statutory ban in all three consolidated cases, on express preemption, and only as to CFTC-registered designated contract markets.Checked Sep 22, 2026
Pending (9)
-
Connecticut cease-and-desist orders to nine platforms (September 2026)
Connecticut ordered nine more platforms to stop offering sports event contracts (September 10, 2026) and issued about thirty subpoenas to vendors, app stores and media organizations.Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
Missouri Attorney General cease-and-desist letters (September 2026)
Missouri’s Attorney General told six platforms to stop offering sports event contracts or get licensed and taxed as sportsbooks (letters dated September 16, 2026).Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
People of the State of New York v. QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US)
No. 1:26-cv-08338
The New York Attorney General filed an Executive Law § 63(12) petition against QCX LLC (Polymarket US) seeking an injunction, restitution, disgorgement and statutory penalties.Checked Sep 25, 2026
-
QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. James
No. 1:26-cv-08345
Polymarket US sued New York’s Attorney General and Gaming Commission (September 24, 2026) for a declaration that federal law preempts state enforcement against its event contracts.Checked Sep 25, 2026
-
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. QCX LLC (Polymarket)
No. C-24-CV-26-005535 · No. 1:26-cv-03253
Baltimore filed a separate consumer-protection action against Polymarket’s exchange entities — QCX LLC, Blockratize Inc. and QC Tech LLC — alongside its Kalshi suit; QCX removed it to federal court.Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. Torrez
No. 1:26-cv-02100
Stayed by agreement (August 2026) before any merits ruling.Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
Kentucky enforcement actions v. Kalshi & others (Franklin Circuit Court)
No. 26-CI-00689 · No. 26-CI-00696 · No. 3:26-cv-00048
Kentucky’s AG sued Kalshi, Polymarket, and distribution partners (June 2026), plus an excise tax; the CFTC then sued the state.Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
State of Rhode Island v. KalshiEX LLC
No. PC-2026-02753 · No. 1:26-cv-00333
Rhode Island’s AG sued Kalshi and Polymarket US (May 2026); the case is consolidated with Kalshi’s own suit, in which the United States and the CFTC intervened.Checked Sep 22, 2026
-
QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. Campbell
No. 1:26-cv-10651
Stayed by stipulation (March 2026) until Kalshi exhausts its state appeal, with the Attorney General agreeing not to enforce against Polymarket US in the meantime.Checked Sep 25, 2026
What Changed
Logged September 25, 2026
-
QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. James
Polymarket US sued New York’s Attorney General and the eight Gaming Commission officials in federal court for a declaration that the Commodity Exchange Act preempts state enforcement against its event contracts, the same day the Attorney General petitioned against it.
Complaint, QCX LLC v. James, 1:26-cv-08345 (S.D.N.Y.), ECF 1 -
People of the State of New York v. QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US)
Polymarket US removed the Attorney General’s petition to the Southern District of New York (No. 1:26-cv-08338), invoking the federal-officer removal statute and federal-question jurisdiction.
Notice of removal, 1:26-cv-08338 (S.D.N.Y.), ECF 1 -
QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. Campbell
Added to the tracker: Polymarket US’s Massachusetts preemption suit, stayed by stipulation in March 2026 until Kalshi exhausts its state appeal, with the Attorney General agreeing not to enforce in the meantime.
Stipulation and joint motion to stay, 1:26-cv-10651 (D. Mass.), ECF 21 -
State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board v. Blockratize Inc. (Polymarket)
Added to the tracker: the Nevada Gaming Control Board’s enforcement action against Polymarket, remanded to state court in March 2026, where a preliminary injunction has since been entered; Polymarket’s remand appeal is on hold at the Ninth Circuit.
Order granting remand, 3:26-cv-00089 (D. Nev.), ECF 41
Logged September 24, 2026
-
People of the State of New York v. QCX LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US)
New York’s Attorney General filed an Executive Law § 63(12) petition against QCX LLC, which does business as Polymarket US, in New York County Supreme Court. It seeks an injunction against unlicensed event contracts, restitution, disgorgement, treble gains and $100,000 per unauthorized sports-wagering offer.
NY Attorney General — Verified Petition
Logged September 22, 2026
-
QCX, LLC (d/b/a Polymarket US) v. Nessel
Michigan filed its Sixth Circuit brief defending the denial of Polymarket US’s injunction. Polymarket US’s reply is next.
CourtListener — No. 26-1552 (6th Cir.)
5 more changes
Logged September 22, 2026
-
Missouri Attorney General cease-and-desist letters (September 2026)
Missouri’s Attorney General told Kalshi, Polymarket, Crypto.com, Novig, Underdog and Robinhood to stop offering sports event contracts or be licensed and taxed as sportsbooks. No suit has been filed by either side.
Missouri AG — letter to Kalshi -
Connecticut cease-and-desist orders to nine platforms (September 2026)
Connecticut ordered nine more platforms — Polymarket, Coinbase, Crypto.com, Robinhood, ProphetX, Novig, Webull, Gemini and Underdog — to stop offering sports event contracts, and subpoenaed about thirty vendors, app stores and media organizations.
Governor of Connecticut — announcement -
State of Rhode Island v. KalshiEX LLC
Rhode Island’s case is formally consolidated with Kalshi’s own suit before Chief Judge McElroy, and Polymarket US is a co-defendant in it. We had described three parallel tracks and a separate CFTC suit; the CFTC intervened rather than suing.
Kalshi filing under the consolidated caption -
Kentucky enforcement actions v. Kalshi & others (Franklin Circuit Court)
Kentucky’s June filings were two complaints, not one: the Kalshi action (No. 26-CI-00689, Judge Shepherd) names Kalshi with its brokers Robinhood, Webull and Coinbase, and Polymarket is sued separately. Kalshi removed its case to federal court; Kentucky’s remand motion was fully briefed August 31.
Kentucky AG — Kalshi complaint (No. 26-CI-00689) -
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. QCX LLC (Polymarket)
We had no federal docket for Baltimore’s Polymarket case. It is No. 1:26-cv-03253, removed August 17 and assigned to Judge Richard D. Bennett — not the judge who has the Kalshi case.
CourtListener — 1:26-cv-03253